The times they are (not) a-changin’


(former UNC star and current Milwaukee Buck, John Henson)

The New York Times’ Greg Bishop reported Wednesday on the IMG Intercollegiate Athletics Forum, which took place this week in New York. It included many of the luminaries of the industry, include the big five conference commissioners and NCAA President Dr. Mark Emmert.

Bishop says that talk of major change was very much in the air. And that it was also very much talk.

Though the confab included much discussion of reorganizing conferences, stream-lined governance and trimming down the unwieldy rule book, all parties were agreed that, unless they are forced to do so by the courts or Congress, “the N.C.A.A. will not pay players, will not consider paying players and will not entertain the notion of paying players — never, ever, no matter how much revenue is generated.”

Bishop noted a strong circle-the-wagons mindset among the assembled conferees. There was lots of lamenting about how poorly the NCAA had communicated its message and about how unfair it was that the NCAA is widely regarded as running an unfair enterprise – a racket you might say.

Bishop observed: “We also heard a lot about student-athletes and how happy they were and how much they benefited from their scholarships. We heard about this from men in tailored suits who profit handsomely off college sports and whose universities and conferences cull revenue from the same.”

In this context, Emmert insisted at one point: “The countervailing voices of this notion that student-athletes are being taken advantage of has been the dominant theme and had played out pretty loudly,” Emmert said. “The reality is schools are spending in between $100,000 and $250,000 on each student-athlete.”

This particular line of argument is particularly irksome. You see the argument in different forms, but, in its most version, NCAA defenders take all the money spent on athletics on a campus, or on a particular sport on campus, divide it by the participants and come up with a number that is supposed to sound like it’s just compensation for the players. What this means is that, for example, if Alabama has 100 football players, and Nick Saban gets a $2 million dollar raise, the University of Alabama and Mark Emmert and whomever can brag that they are now spending an additional $20,000 on each football player. Is this a meaningful reflection of the schools’ investment in the players, especially their education?

Bishop – the snark is strong with this one – couldn’t resist highlighting the endless recitation of the NCAA’s favorite propaganda term – “student athlete’: “If the N.C.A.A. collected $1 for every time the term “student-athlete” was used, it could have afforded to pay all players in all sports a significant stipend. At least enough for pizza.”

Because this is the NCAA, it’s hard to tell whether the powers-that-be are simply corrupt or whether they are genuinely self-deluded. Bishop’s characterization of the NCAA’s opposition to any real change in compensation for athletes goes as follows: “to go to an Olympic model, in which players endorse products relative to their value on the open market, would affect recruiting. To pay players beyond an increased stipend for the cost of tuition would strike at the heart of the idea that they’re students first. It would reinforce that the billions generated by college football and men’s basketball, in particular, demonstrate that they might be something else.” If you think Bishop is being unfair here, he then quotes the appropriately named Big 12 Commissioner, Bob Bowlsby: “If college athletics establishes an employer-employee relationship, we will truly have lost our way.”

Not “have,” mind you. “Will have.” Yeah.




  1. I can’t remember who said this, but I agree with whoever it was: if NCAA basketball players don’t like not getting paid, then don’t go to college, join the NBA D-League instead, be developed for the NBA for a year, and then declare for the draft. I’m not sure about other sports, but people act like the NBA has required all players go through one year of college before being drafted. That’s not true. You just have to wait one year after high school. So, at least college basketball players, stop whining about it, go to the D-League, and get paid and developed. It seems so simple. I don’t get it.

    People act like the NCAA is the only organization doing something like this. High Schools and Middle Schools get money for higher student grades on state-required exams. You don’t see high school students demanding to be paid to take it.

    People complain about the system but still eagerly join it. It makes no sense.

  2. And administration employees, professors, teachers, aides, maintenance staff, ESPECIALLY coaches, et all, should also not be paid. Tickets for attending these functions should be free. If a state institution, all income should be returned to taxpayers. Also, Sydney, you should not be paid for your efforts, so stop whining.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s